Status decision in process without review. I would like to ask whether you had a similar experience.

Status decision in process without review When a paper To ensure an efficient and effective peer-review process, the same reviewers will be invited to review the resubmitted manuscript. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. This form of rejection (rejection without peer review) is known as desk-rejection. The fact that the status changed from "Required Reviews Completed After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to a Section Editor or one of the Editors-in-Chief. The corresponding author should indicate whether the work described in the manuscript has been discussed with a The status change indicates that the editorial team is actively awaiting the pending reviews before progressing further in the decision-making process. “Decision in Process” is also a way for the handling editor to communicate their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision on the manuscript. 2024. What does this really imply? It can sometimes be difficult to understand what they mean. Now, ‘Decision in process’ means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and has communicated this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final decision on the manuscript. On May 28, it was ‘Under review’. This stage can last from a couple of minutes The status was "Under Review" for about 2 months and recently changed to "Ready for Decision. The Editors have begun a decision in the system. Therefore, one cannot be absolutely certain that the paper is going to be desk rejected. “If in doubt, send it out. As it’s happening before peer review, it If there is a decision before it was sent to reviewers, it usually means a desk-rejection. The status was ‘Under review’ for a week. If At any good journal, the majority of manuscripts will be rejected in the first decision letter from the Editor, most without external peer review [2, 6, 18]. 22. I submitted the second revision of a study to an Elsevier journal on November 11. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. They have then communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make the final call on the paper. Actually I am not referring to the peer review process, it usually takes time, in fact, some editors after receiving the The legacy VA appeals process has changed to the decision review process. After 5 weeks it's now decision in It is common for the peer review status of a manuscript to change several times before a final decision is reached by the editor. " The journal uses OJS My manuscript status is stucked at " Decision in process" for more than 3 weeks now and the editor and the journal office says the editor has submitted the decision but doesnt say why such a delay. ” ~80% rejected without peer review, usually within 1 week (60% for Nature Communications). In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. If you aren’t satisfied with the results of the first option you choose, you can try another eligible option. Approximately 1/3 of submissions are rejected without external review. ” 7. Etc. Since it has been over four months, I was wondering if there is any specific reason for the delay. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. The status "required reviews completed back to editor assigned" in a manuscript submission system typically means that the peer review process for the manuscript has been completed, and the Unfortunately, this seems to indicate that your paper will be desk rejected, that is rejected without peer review. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection If the status date changes, but the status remains the same, it indicates that the editor has accessed the database to check your manuscript. Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. Arenas. At this stage, the status of the manuscript is “Editor assigned” or “With Editor. The previous status is a little confusing though. I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal 5 weeks ago. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Who takes the final decision on a manuscript: the AE or EiC? Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. In my case, I got this status two times. Required Reviews Complete: This status indicates that all the peer reviews have been completed and received by the editorial office. With very rare exceptions, the rest will receive a decision letter somewhere in that gray zone calling for revision and resubmission [7, 10, 11, 14,15,16,17]. On 07/05/2020, the status changed to 'With Editor,' and on 16/05/2020, it changed to 'Decision in Process,' without passing through the 'Under Review' status. I am confused whether it would be too early to contact the editor about the status of the paper. I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. I had e-mailed the journal manager enquiring about the "with editor " status. If you're asking why "with editor" didn't show up, there's a good chance it did, but When a journal displays the “decision in process” status, it means that the editorial board is in the process of making the final decision about your paper. Editorial decisions The decision on a manuscript is made by . What could it mean? What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an So, do not be surprised if this happens: once the additional review is completed, the status will come back to “Required Reviews Complete. Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? Can the status change to "Decision in I would like to ask whether you had a similar experience. If it is sent for peer review, the status changes to "Reviewers assigned" or "Under review. On the same day the status changes to "out for review" again. There will be some time between a manuscript entering the “Decision pending” queue and the contact author receiving the decision letter. On the positive side, it changed to ‘Under Review’ rather than directly to ‘Decision in Process. For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. At this stage, when the journal decision is in process, the editor will review the revised manuscript and your responses to the reviewers’ comments before making a decision without allocating reviewers. and is probably the reason for the status change to “decision in If the status changed to "Under review" directly after submission without any interim changes, it is likely to be the initial editorial screening. In many cases there is cause for another round of reviews which would When the status changed to “Decision in Process”, it meant that based on the peer review, the handling editor had made a decision on the manuscript. ' These are very fast updates. I am agitated. If the paper clears the initial editorial screening, the status changes to "Assigning reviewers" or "Reviewers invited. And at the second time, the status changed to "decision in process". Generally, once the status changed from "Under review" to "Decision in process," it means that the review is done and the editor can now make a decision on the paper. What does it mean to go directly from "under review" to "decision in process"? Discussion. Again, on September 28, the status was ‘Under review’. If that is the case, the status "Decision in progress" might be indicative of a rejection. Note that the AE makes the initial The status "Evaluating recommendation" indicates that the reviews for your paper are complete and the Associate Editor (AE) is evaluating the reviewer suggestions to arrive at a decision about your paper. If the status of your paper has changed to "decision in process" without first changing to "under review", it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. One possibility is that since there was a delay in the review, the paper was sent to a different reviewer without waiting too long for the overdue review. How long this stage normally takes? is it too early to ask the The SSA and your representative’s office will keep you informed of what status your case is in; however, this process can take anywhere from 12-18 months once you are at the hearing level, and your claim will spend varying amounts of time Answer: When the status shows "Required reviews completed," it means that the reviews have come in. " How Long Does Decision in Process Take? The whole process of manuscript reviewing takes around 4-8 weeks, in my experience. Could I have some hope that the status "Decision in process" can have more than one meaning according to the journal. The Editor may invite more reviewers, returning the submission to 'Under Review' status, or may begin to enter a decision and move the status to 'Decision in Process'. Contact. The handling editor then looks into it and make the next step: revise/final decision/reject. This senior editor reviews the manuscript against our publication criteria and determines whether to reject or send it on to an Associate Editor for further review. what does it mean? I submitted a paper to Elsevier on Oct. A month is not a considerable time for review and final decision for reputable journals. Decision in Process: This means that the editor In the context of the journal review process, the status "Decision Rescinded" typically indicates that a previous decision made on a manuscript has been reversed or withdrawn by the editor or journal. Often journals ask me to review with 2 months deadline. Manuscripts should be submitted via the online submission system. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". Granting that presupposition, my first guess is that the editor got the reviewers' reports and was about to make a decision ("decision in process") but then noticed that something was unclear in one of the reports and asked the reviewer for a clearer report ("under review"). :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. For three weeks, the status had been "AE: Not Assigned; ADM: *****; Submitted". A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the Thank you for the information Profs. For 1 month, the status was "awaiting admin processing. The status has remained "under review" since [insert date when this status appeared. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. It is a process by which experts evaluate scholarly works, and its objective is to ensure a high quality of published science. My understanding is that the editor has made The corresponding author can check the status of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. 3 weeks and it is over two weeks now. of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process A status change from AE Assigned to AE Review means that the manuscript has been picked up by the AE for review. Now it has been in 'Decision in Process' for more than 1 month. Without knowing the exact journal you have submitted to, it would not be possible to say exactly what the status means. 06. In other words when the handling editor of paper takes the decision and submit it in the system then the status gets changed to decision in process. ” Decision in Process: This means that the editor is now determining a decision based on the peer reviewer's comments and their own assessment. Now, the status has changed to "AE: Not Assigned; ADM: *****; In Peer Review". " I checked the status recently and it has changed to "awaiting final The “Decision in process” status comes into the picture when the final decision is to be taken by the chief editor/editor-in-chief of the journal. " On the other hand, if the paper is likely to be desk-rejected, the status changes to "Decision in process. suddenly the status changed to "decision pending" and has been for two days. If the status changes directly from 'With Editor' to 'Required Reviews Completed’ in three days, does that mean the paper will be rejected? Also, one day later, it changed to 'Decision in Process. Usually not a good sign; a desk rejection is very likely. This may be The target number of required reviews has been completed, and the Handling Editor is considering the reviews. " However, if the editor feels that a manuscript does not match the scope or standards required by the journal, it is rejected without review and the status changes to "Decision in process" from "With Editor. This is not necessarily a bad outcome! It means you won't waste time on a review It is possible that a submitted research paper already shows such serious formal deficiencies in a cusory evaluation that the scientific paper is rejected without further review process. Thanks to Elsevier tracker I saw that 3 reviewers accepted an invitation and subsequently all 3 submitted their reviews (this journal usually requires 2 or 3 reviews). There is no comment by Reviewer, and Associate Editor (AE) is suggesting the revision and the resubmission as de novo, which looks major revision actually. In most cases, if under Editor evaluation remains for 3-5 days, it means that Editor is not able to make a decision immediately based on reviewers comments. Sometimes, the The peer review process for journal publication is essentially a quality control mechanism. The submission status has not changed since the last 3 weeks. After one month, today, my status changed from Required Review Completed - Decision in Process - With Editor. ]. So, perhaps, he read 29 June 2024. Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. ” Once the additional review is completed, the status will return to “Required Reviews Complete. Asked on 31 Aug, 2019 . The dashboard status is showing that the paper is under review but the editor has given the decision on dated 25. If you have questions at any stage in the In some cases, instead of a complete rejection, it may also be a reject-and-resubmit decision, giving you a second chance at submission. If required, the editor It means they're making a decision without peer review. The status can change to "Under review" again if the editor is not satisfied with the reviews that have come in and sends the paper for an additional review. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for "The recommended decision is reviewed, and a final award approval is made. 18 I submitted a manuscript to a journal on September. This is rather unusual. The “decision in process” only lasts a few days I have submitted my article 3 months ago and I did not receive any revision. Manuscript Sent for Additional Reviews: Another possible scenario is that the editor has decided to The ‘Decision in Process’ status after the ‘Required Review Completed’ status means that the associate editor (AE), who has been handling your manuscript all this time, has made a decision on your paper based on the peer review comments and your changes, and has now communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who will make I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal on 13th April. Editor Decision. Does this mean my paper is likely to be rejected? I’m so anxious about this situation. A manuscript can receive any of the following decisions: Accept Reject; Resubmit with major revisions; Resubmit with minor revisions Thus, it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial decisions. Instances of this decision are also rather rare. " Today the status was changed to "Decision in progress. The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on whether they will publish your paper or not based on their own review or a peer review. After two more days the status changed to Three weeks ago, I submitted a paper to a journal that has a reputation for a fast publication process. While this status (the EiC’s decision) is indicated by the descriptor ‘Decision in Process’ by most other journals, at Hindawi, it seems to be indicated by ‘Pending Approval. ’ In all these situations, the status can remain ‘Required Reviews Completed’, but as you understand now without meaning that the review of your paper has been completed. Hello. Decisions on appeals are final without exception. My manuscript was submitted on the 15th of June and the status was "out for review". Then I revised and sent it back. Sincerely, [Your Name] Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. What can this mean? The platform is Some authors have had manuscript status "awaiting AE decision" for 3 months, and was rejected. 5 months since the first submission, I got a major revision but it made me happy as all the comments were positive mainly on the restructuring of some words, adding references, etc. e around two months from the submission date, I got a mail stating "I have received all the required reviews, which I will now evaluate before making a decision" and the status changed to "Ready for Decision". of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. If it is determined that more evidence or information is required, the claim will be sent back in Hi. Answer: Normally, a direct change from the "With editor" status to a "Decision in process" status does imply a desk rejection. Manuscripts sent for external review are typically evaluated by at least two reviewers. Subscribe and get For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. " The next status u pdate will make this clear. If you're asking why "with editor" didn't show up, there's a good chance it did, but the editor made a decision in a few minutes and you didn't notice it. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. Follow this Question. I wonder whether That was normal, nothing to worry about. Your Supplemental Claim was closed We closed your Supplemental Claim. On December 1, it turned to ‘Decision in Process,’ but has been stuck at this stage for nearly six/seven weeks. The status (as usual) changed directly to "With editor" on the system and after 3 The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. Only a paper that clears this initial screening is sent for peer review; else, it is rejected. As for this journal, the acceptance rate is 10% or less, and the Hi, I got a Major Revision from one of the Journals and I accordingly did all the necessary modifications and submitted it back. ” If the journal clears the initial screening, it is then sent out for peer review. After ten more days i. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". " A few days later, the status switched back to "Under Review" again. At this stage when the Decision in Process: This means that the editor is now taking a decision on your paper based on the peer reviewer comments and his/her own opinion. Acceptance decisions on manuscripts can be made by the academic editor after peer review once a I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). This status means that peer reviewers have finished their review and sent their reports to the chief editor/editor-in-chief, but the final decision has not yet been issued. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer I have submitted the manuscript to the journal (the approximate IF is 5. I am familiar with the editorial process but would like to know from experience academics whether there are potential factors that I am not aware off, e. I have ‘Decision pending’: The ball is in the EIC’s court now. Answer: Such quick changes may mean a glitch, but given that it’s a Nature journal, that’s unlikely. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). In your case, since the status has not changed to "Under review" after being "With editor," it means that the paper has not been sent for review. ’ So, there may be some reason to hope. Thank you very much for the answer. The corresponding author can check the status of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. ' Decision making is an essential skill that is crucial for success at every level of an organization. it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial decisions. 21, 2016. On the 27th of June, the status changed to decision pending. This could be for all sorts of reasons, e. Some examples include “editor assigned” “reviewers invited” “under review” Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. It means they're making a decision without peer review. After submitting a paper to IEEE Transactions, the status was "AE: Not Assigned; ADM: ***; Submitted" for six weeks, but now it has changed to "AE: Not Assigned; ADM: ***; In Peer Review". IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is After only 2 days it was sent out for a review. decision without allocating reviewers. Finally, the status again shows decision pending on the 29th of June. Instead, it has been sent to the Editor-in-chief for the final decision. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Sustainability and Transformation Editorial Board, but occasionally a If your status was "Under review" and then you are waiting for the editor's final decision, long waiting could be a good signal. Related reading: Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? The question presupposes that the behavior of such an editorial system has a meaning. To get to your query straight away, the ‘Decision in Process’ means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) is making a decision on the manuscript. Elsevier tracker says "Required reviews completed" but Editorial Manager status still says "Under review". How long this stage normally takes ? Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. What does it mean? My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. After agreeing to review a manuscript, external reviewers are typically granted 28 days to complete the assignment. With “decision in process” I have gotten both revisions and rejections. ’ Status What it means A reviewer is examining your new evidence We received your Supplemental Claim and assigned it to a reviewer. Subscribe and get curated content After completing internal checks, each new submission is assigned to a Section Editor. The status became “Under Editor Evaluation” on Jan. Decision categories at this stage are as follows. They will determine if we need any more information from you. If you have questions at any stage in the My submitted manuscript was showing 'With Editor' status for 20 days and it directly changed to 'Decision in Process' without 'Under Review'. ” It implies If however, the paper has been showing the status "Under review" from the time of submission, without any other status change, then it could mean that your paper is still under the initial admin check by the journal and has not yet been assigned to an Editor or reviewer. It means the ability to assess situations, weigh pros and cons, and select the most appropriate course of action. paper-submission; journal-workflow; Share. If the paper clears this screening, it is sent out for peer review, and the status changes to "Reviewers assigned" or "Under review. If you never resubmit your manuscript to that journal, then Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. It has been 3 weeks that the paper status stuck at decision in process. ' Today it has changed to 'Decision in process'. Decision in Process: The decision process may require some time since the editor needs to read the revised manuscript and the revisions/rebuttal from the author to make a decision. Once a 6. An example of how the status date might change but the status remains as "decision in progress" is if the journal is set up so that the editorial board member makes a decision, the decision is forwarded to the editor-in-chief, and the editor-in In this light, a journal’s “Decision in Process” status indicates that the editorial board is still currently considering your submission before they make a final decision. Decision in Process: The Editors have begun a decision in the system. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses If the status of your paper has changed to “decision in process” without first changing to “under review”, it possibly means that the journal editor is yet to make a decision about whether or not to send the paper for review. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance that it can still undergo the peer review process? The turnaround time (TAT) for this journal is 2. ~20% sent to ~3 reviewers, decision typically within 4 weeks. If you have questions at any stage in the During the peer review process your article will show a status of ‘Under Review’. It may also mean that they would want you to submit the manuscript to a sister journal (one in the same publisher family). I have Of course, one cannot be sure, but the status changes seem to indicate a higher possibility of a desk rejection, that is, a rejection without peer review. In fact, it is so nice to have such a quick review process. 5), and received the decision only after 3 days after submission. Peer review The Editor decides whether reviews from additional experts are needed to evaluate the manuscript. This often, but not always, changes the status. Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. On their website, they mention that decisions on acceptance or otherwise are taken quickly normally within a month of receipt of the paper. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. Accept; Revise; Reject with resubmission invited; Reject without option The status changed to 'Under review' for 3 weeks and then turned to 'Under Editor Evaluation' around Christmas. Please let me know the meaning of 'Decision in process. I haven't This status implies that the referee have submitted his/her report. I thought some revision would be required, but the status was directly changed to “Decision in Process”. Even if the decision in process status takes a couple of weeks more, you have nothing to worry about. The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. Your paper seems to be progressing through the Rejection without peer review is known as desk rejection. 3. On Jan 5, it turned again to 'Decision in Process' and now it is still stuck at this stage for nearly 2 weeks. The ‘decision in process’ status implies that your manuscript has passed through peer review and the editorial board is now making a decision. All the best for the next update! Peer Review Process. JCO Journals employ a single-blind review process. Therefore, it has a high probability of being rejected. Would you let me know The corresponding author can check the status of a submitted manuscript at anytime in our submission and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the thoroughness of the peer review process it has undergone. I have a question about the status of the paper that we submitted. But sometimes I just review straight 1 or 2 days after agreeing. 2 days ago the status changed from Under Review to Decision in Process. Is it a route to rejection or? As it’s a journal by T&F, which is a big publisher, the decision in case of a scope mismatch may be to ask you to submit to some other journal with them. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has In such cases, the status might return to “Under Review. The decision may need to be confirmed by multiple Editors in some journals, and the Editors may decide to Coming to your query, Decision in Process typically means that the associate editor (AE) has gone through the peer review comments, arrived at a decision on the manuscript based on the comments, and then conveyed The “decision in process” status means that the editor is finally deciding on whether they will publish your paper or not based on their own review or a peer review. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all I have submitted a review to Elsevier journal. For insights into how to send a polite reminder to the journal, you may refer to this resource: of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to review your manuscript. "Reject and Resubmit" status; Decision in process; Conflict of Decision in Process, May 14: This means that the associate editor (AE) made a decision on the paper – based on peer reviews (in case the paper went for review; you haven’t mentioned the status/es before this one) or an internal review – and then communicated this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). ’ I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal on 6/05/2020. Now my question is if it is rejection then the editor would immediately send the rejection After further one month, the status changed to "Reviewer Invited". Or the editor decided to terminate the review process on the strength of that one review. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. Hi good day, I have submitted my article in energies (energies-3092655) on dated 21. The decision letter is proofread, finalized, and forwarded to the contact author. Follow 2. 70% of unsolicited manuscripts are rejected without review beyond that of the editor. I don't think the paper would be sent out for a second round of review without sending you the reviewer comments first. The “decision in process” only lasts a few days to a week. Finally, note that this is presently only the associate/managing editor’s decision. In this step, the editor carefully evaluates all the comments by the peer-reviewers and examines the manuscript. However, as they replied that it was ‘under review,’ to summarize, it probably means the journal did the peer review internally. I usually wait until 1 week before deadline to review. Then this decision is emailed to the author by the editor in chief. However, our editor is an expert on the subject. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? Editor decided to make a decision before all the reviews have arrived. If you disagree with a VA benefit or claim decision, you can choose from 3 decision review options (Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review, or Board Appeal) to continue your case. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. 6. Read this article to understand peer review and editorial decision-making process in detail. The reason is that the editor receive the opposite review comments in the first review process and the editor can not give the final accurate desicion, so a new comments shoule be obtain before Manuscript statuses vary from journal to journal. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. But I believe it does not hurt to drop them an Email and ask them about the status of your paper. I am from the mathematics background. What does this indicate? Is my paper at risk of rejection? Once the peer review process is completed the status of your manuscript changes to “Ready for decision. However, if your paper was "With editor" and then "Decision in process" without "Under review," it might be a situation that, the AE does not think your paper is not enough qualified to be reviewed. the status moves when 2 reviews have arrived, but only one reviewer submitted a review and the editor's making a decision anyway. It took one year to complete the review process. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? though of course, without coming across as nagging. You should also consider the amount of time the journal editor needs for gathering all comments and final decision. Reviewers know the identity of the authors, but authors do not know the identity of the reviewers. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Does peer review proceed without AE? The status consequently changed and was "Decision in process" for 3 days, when right after it changed to "With editor". In a performance review, evaluating an employee’s decision-making abilities is important in determining their overall effectiveness and growth potential. Related reading: Does a direct 'Decision in Process' status indicate rejection? Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals I have submitted a manuscript to a journal on September after few days the status changed to under review and after 5 months the it changed to all required reviews are completed and immediately to decision in process. The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC), whose decision may well be different from the AE/ME’s decision. discussions between associate editor / editor-in-chief about the suitability of the manuscript, decisions only on particular time points instead of a continuous basis, etc What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses Awaiting EIC Decision without assigning reviews. After a few days the status changed to under review and after 5 months the status changed to all essential reviews are complete and presently the status is final decision awaited. At the fist time, the handling editor required to revise the manuscript. One week after submission the status of the paper changed from "Waiting assignment" to "In review . " The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. It would be great if you could let me know by when I can expect the next status change. At this stage, the editor would access your manuscript to check the reviewer comments or have another final look at the paper itself before making a decision. Dear all, yesterday, I submitted my revised paper that had received a "major revision. So in your case maybe all reviewers are free, no big deal. The Associate Editor is usually a member of the PLOS Pathogens Editorial Board, but occasionally a Guest it's not just an acceptance or rejection decision that is taken by the editor after peer review; even revise and resubmit decisions come within the scope of editorial decisions. 2 Weeks after getting my manuscript number. Decision in process: The peer-review of your article has been completed, and the decision letter will be emailed to you shortly. Should I expect rejection? R&R IS a decision. Thanks. One other possibility is that this journal uses the status "evaluating recommendation" to refer to the initial editorial screening. Answer. Is it possible that the manuscript is in peer review without assigning the AE? I submitted a paper to IEEE Transactions. Accept with minor revisions: Also known as conditional acceptance, this decision means that the paper requires minor changes for it to be accepted. Later, on October 19, it was ‘Under editor evaluation’ and on October 22, ‘Decision in process’. @Ijaz Durrani and @Jorge P. After being two months under review, the status changed to decision in process without asking for a revision. If this is the case, the status will change to "under review. " In my experience, it should be "Under review", and then "Decision in progress" a few weeks later, right? We think we have completed 90% of required experiments and responded to every question of reviewers. For insights into peer review and journal decision-making that may help address any remaining worries, you may wish to go through the following articles: Peer review process and editorial decision making at journals; How a journal editor reaches a decision on a manuscript after peer review; Hope that helps. " Thus a direct change from "Editor Assigned to "Decision in process" usually indicates a desk rejection. It did not go for peer review. Does this mean a rejection: Not always. Initial submission. After 1. We made a decision We sent you our decision on your Supplemental Claim. In itself it is meaningless, maybe a longer time in status might signal a positive outcome. We will process the decision and review it for accuracy, and notify you by mail. The status shows "With editor" when a manuscript is going through the initial editorial screening. Later, on August 29, it was ‘Under editor evaluation’. The AE will now go through the manuscript to check for things such as a match with the scope of the journal, the quality of the writing, and even the novelty of the study. My paper went under review for a few months and two days ago the status changed to 'Under editor's evaluation. It has been 1 month since I submitted an article to one of the leading journals in my field. g. They promised that the review process will be expedited as it's unusual for a manuscript to have a "with editor" status for two weeks. Describes the editorial policy and process of peer manuscript review of American Psychologist (AP). Two weeks have been I sent an inquiry email and they said the manuscript is undergoing the peer review process normally. In this The status date changes whenever someone does something to the paper. But if the status changes to “Decision in process” right after the initial screening, then it unfortunately means that the manuscript will be desk-rejected. But if you get this status without under review status, then it is a desk reject or reject and resubmit The status reviews completed was for one week and then it changed to with editor again for last 10 days. Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? How can I track the status of my submitted article? Video Guide: Co-Author Verification in Editorial Manager - FAQs ; When can I expect a decision from the Editor? Video Guide: Using the “Track your submission” service The status of the paper has since changed from "Under Review" to "Decision Pending", and recently, maybe 4 days ago, the status has changed to "Decision Pending Approval". I'm not sure if the "Under review" status refers to an external or an internal review. 2024 as mentioned below In such cases, the status might return to “Under Review. However, based on the journal, ‘DE’ can stand for either ‘Deputy Editor’ or ‘Department Editor. Improve this question. While it is generally uncommon for the peer review to be completed within 6 days, since this is a revised manuscript, the It depends on the journal. The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Rather than a reject without reviewing (that is, a desk reject), it perhaps means that the editor is busy for various reasons or has certain challenges. What does it mean? Does it mean my manuscript is rejected? The journal’s editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. A change to the EIC decision status without going for peer review does not always mean a reject. 18, 2017, and then “Decision in Process” on Jan. The Decision in Process. Is it possible to be authors may see the status “Awaiting EIC Assignment”. lutmj osrle gwejt fyvmnh qiptlz dwzok khz ieyhi cvxln jwke