Court sentencing results singapore It has been an indispensable tool for the legal community since 1990. If a judgment or decision is not available on SLW, it may be found on LawNet or is in the process of publication. Choose keywords that are unique enough to identify the information you want. LawNet is Singapore’s leading portal for legal research, information and transactions. Criminal Procedure and Sentencing — Appeal , Courts and Jurisdiction — Court judgments , Criminal Law — Offences — Outrage of modesty Decision Date: 03 Dec 2024 DJK and others v DJN [2024] SGHC 309 You can also use Wildcard Characters and Search Operators. sg if you have any feedback. It navigates the contours of the two-step sentencing bands framework in Ng Kean Meng Terence v Public Prosecutor [2017] SGCA 37. The sentencing court is guided in arriving at the appropriate sentence in each case by considering and weighing the four classical principles of sentencing, namely, deterrence, retribution, prevention and rehabilitation. Written decisions of cases heard in court and selected case summaries of these decisions. LawNet is subscribed by a majority of Singapore lawyers and is also accessible by anyone outside the profession. com. . Courts & Crime News - Get latest Courts & Crime news & top stories from Straits Times Singapore at straitstimes. Indeed, reliance by the courts on sentencing precedents to arrive at consistent and fair outcomes is a core feature of sentencing practice in Singapore. Written decisions of cases heard in court and selected case summaries of these decisions. Refer to LawNet for the latest State Courts and Family Justice Courts judgments. This section contains all written judgments issued by the Supreme Court of Singapore since 2000. Searching for words that appear too commonly will likely return a greater number of irrelevant results. Supreme Court judgments from 2000 and IPOS and PDPC decisions from 2018 onwards are archived on SLW permanently. If you do not know the case number, key in and search by hearing type (eg, mention, case conference, mediation, hearing) or case type (eg, MSS, SS, FC/D), and additionally filter by “Courts” to “Family Justice Courts” and filter the “Date” to the date of your court attendance. Judgments and decisions are organised according to decision date. Please contact us at elitigation@crimsonlogic. Yet, the value of each sentencing precedent depends on a whole host of factors and it is important for the courts to bear this in mind when deciding on whether to rely on a particular precedent This article surveys the recent Supreme Court judgments with regard to the analytical framework for sentencing: (a) harm, (b) culpability, (c) aggravating factors and (d) mitigating factors.
shkdj aojy afrvu xgsotla djp yqwuwvy tgydpk ydt vwry cpv