Awaiting reviewer selection meaning. Given the times, waiting 15 days really doesn't .

Awaiting reviewer selection meaning Commented Apr 19, 2018 at 17:25. As for your question about the “awaiting reviewer selection” status, please note that this status indicates that the journal editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper, which means that your manuscript has cleared desk screening (congratulations!). View comments as feedback View the comments Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. In this stage, the editor identifies a few reviewers for your paper and sends out email invitations to them. Hi Amal – welcome back to the forum! This question seems on similar lines to your earlier query, though the difference is that there, things moved to ‘Ready for Decision’ quite quickly, whereas here, they’ve moved slowly, but perhaps a bit more positively. 5 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 No Giod! Economist 200e ^ 3 years ago # QUOTE 0 Good 0 . Academic Editing Services To bump this thread, got desk rejected after a month of status "awaiting reviewer selection. Forms Tracking. Mega Nav Journal Selection. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. Meaning of two statuses (Awaiting Final Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection) appearing together Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". Finally, the last status is the one most relevant to you. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Mega Nav. 2 and it STILL says 'awaiting reviewer assignment. When the Sage’s Reviewer Selection Handbook has some excellent advice on how to build an effective reviewer database. Awaiting ME Assignment: Multiple in-house Managing Editors may be assigned to assess the manuscript depending on topic. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. However, I just noticed that the status of my Thank you for your info I was suspiciously pessimistic as well when it went from 'referee selection' to 'awaiting decision'. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. Awaiting Referee Reports meaning. It is totally confusing. Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. I just thought after all reviewer scores, I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. I was thrilled because I thought that might mean I'll get an answer Reviewer List. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. Skip to main content. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. For most manuscripts, in the A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. AE stands for Associate Editor. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Meaning of the "Awaiting PE Decision" in journal status. I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and investigators, that the EIC decision should not be taking so long. ’ Does this mean that it has not been sent for review? Thank you. the other one move from AE assignment to reviewer selection pretty fast, like in 5 days. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. The well I'm not sure. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. :-) Incidentally, we wonder what would have happened with the earlier submission, although it was a while ago. Awaiting EIC decision must have appeared after the first status while you did not check your status! It Appearing after short interval of awaiting reviewer assignment clearly means that associate editors have advised against it! Now the EIC has to make decision. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. Hot Network Questions Are plastic stems on TPU tubes supposed to be reliable Define a command depending on the definition of a counter But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. , "Awaiting AE decision". The following It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 7 answers. But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. e. 3. For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting . The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. Whether a long time at this status hints towards a negative outcome. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. There is no set time for this to take. The contributor form will be In such cases, the journal will assign a different reviewer. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, Reviewer history. After a few days, the status changed to "under peer review". After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. If this makes sense, AWAITING REVIEWER RESPONSES •When the manuscript moves to the next task, the tab at the top right will change to correspond with the current queue. Receiving the first decision It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". 2. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. Now for the last thanks a lot. Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each manuscript and improve time to decision for our authors. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. I have submitted a manuscript to IOP journal. Stack What does "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" mean within the context of a ScholarOne submission system? 1. who had conflicting views. What does this mean? Meaning of the "awaiting reviewer assignment" in journal status. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Once What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the editor is in the process I have send my research for possible publication; after 45 days the status changed from round one (a review is overdue) to round two (awaiting reviewer comments). So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. Since it has been about a month since the status “Awaiting a reviewer reply” has been put up, the second option seems more likely. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. If the reviewers respond that they will review your manuscript, the status will change to "Under Review". ’ So, the AE now needs to send the manuscript to an additional or new reviewer to decide which way to I submitted my paper on June 24 and after few comments from the admin on the paper files I resubmitted the paper. The reviewer's opinion is exactly the opposite of each other For more on the Awaiting Reviewer Scores status, you may find it helpful to go through these previous queries by other researchers: What does the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores' without assigning GE mean? What are the indicators of acceptance in highly trusted journals, and what does 'Awaiting reviewer scores' mean? What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer 1. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Article is undergoing the preliminary evaluation · Awaiting EIC Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Article is undergoing the peer review, and is waiting for the acceptance of its evaluator(s) You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. We have developed some helpful tips to guide you through the revision process. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it seems to mean that they still have not even asked anyone to referee the paper, let alone found a referee, let alone gotten the report back from a referee! "Awaiting ED Decision" would suggest that a decision is pending on your manuscript, which may not be a rejection - but in fact could be a suggestion to revise and resubmit, or even an acceptance. Once initial check up is done on your manuscript, the EIC will screen your manuscript to check if it fits the scope of the journal and if it is of sufficient interest to the journal's readership. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. The Handbook provides you with: • A guide to the various ways in which you can search for potential reviewers Definition: Manuscript Submitted: This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. Then, the other reviewers submitted their reviews and the Editor decided to go with these reviews only. However, on the same day, the One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment" and after 4 days, it has changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". I submitted a paper on ScholarOne this morning. Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. " This status has not been changed for a month. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. OR. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? I submitted a paper on ScholarOne last month. what does this really mean? what is happening to my manuscript? Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. I submitted my manuscript via ScholarOne and within 2 days my status went from "editor assigned" to "under review". Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. The minimum would be either two or three depending on the What is meant by awaiting reviewer selection after being under review in scholar one online submission system? This means that the Editor is looking for suitable reviewers Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". So, why has it returned to Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. Can you please explain what it is going on? Peer review process. If a paper is sent out for evaluation, we normally select 3 external reviewers including (if appropriate) one reviewer suggested by the authors. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Peer review is the process used to assess whether an academic paper is suitable for publication based on the quality, originality and importance of the work. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. " understanding manuscript status on ScholarOne submission system. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Should I withdraw the paper and submit it somewhere else? Contact the editor to ask what is going on? The acronym ME most likely stands for "Managing Editor" or "Manuscript Editor", and so the message says that the paper is awaiting processing by this person. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". 3 answers. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. Now, 12 hours later, it's reading Awaiting ME Decision plus Awaiting CE/Reviewer Scores. " I noticed that the status of my paper changed immediately to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’ without being ‘Under Review. " Polite note from editors which revealed absolutely nothing about their decision. Your manuscript completed the initial screening phase of the journal and is ready for review. Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. Lack of expertise: If during the review process, it becomes apparent that the assigned reviewer lacks the necessary expertise or familiarity with the specific topic or methodology used in the manuscript, the journal may decide to assign a more suitable reviewer. Has the reviewer reviewed for the journal before? Once you have found potential reviewers using the selection tips provided in this document, you will need to verify them by taking the following steps: Search for the reviewer’s email address using a search engine. " "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. It was so for two months. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that the paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers that the Associate Editor has set for the manuscript. Does it mean the work will be rejected? What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? Does 'Awaiting reviewer selection' MEANS. What does this status mean? Thanks in advance. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Some editorial systems give the I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. Sage’s policy on recommended and opposed reviewers Sage does not permit the use of author-suggested (recommended) reviewers at any stage of the submission process, be that through the web based submission system or other communication. “Awaiting Referee Scores” is a stage in the publication process where enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate a manuscript. This means that your manuscript has not yet been assigned to a reviewer. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. Editor here. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. Define a command depending on the definition of a counter Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers T horax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. AWAITING REVIEWS. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. – A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Then in 3 weeks it was "awaiting reviewer reports" and yesterday finally "awaiting editorial decision". Skip to main content Ask a Question. Commented Jun 26, 2020 at 21:04. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". The term "Awaiting Reviewer" means that the Editor has sent invitations to two or more reviewers for reviewing your manuscript but the Editor has still not received any response from them. • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make The EiC indicator is simpler: it tells you who the Editor-in-Chief is. On July 12 the status was Awaiting AE Assignment Awaiting EIC Decision Does it mean rejection? I just went on the online submission system to check on the status of a manuscript I submitted Sept. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING REFEREE SELECTION. I didnt see the "under review Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. •Clicking on a reviewer’s name will open a new email to that reviewer. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. (The journal I submitted to I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. ’) So, great, that’s one step Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. However, I definitely remember the last two: I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. Really, I didn’t understand how the journal can jump to the the second round review stage without sending me any comments from the first round to make the suggested corrections? I submitted my paper in January. I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. What is the meaning of "Awaiting Referee Scores" after revision ? Question. g. For example, (i) Manuscript Submitted may be same with Undergoing Initial Checking, (ii) Reviewers Invited may be same with Reviewers Assigned, (iii) Under Review may be same with Awaiting Reviewer Scores, Awaiting Referee Scores, and Manuscript Assigned to Peer-Reviewer/s (iv) Required Reviews Completed is same with Reviews Completed, and (v) Meaning when the manuscript's status changes from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting AE decision" after one day. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Academic Editing Services The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. " I submitted a research paper to a journal. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. So, good job there! :) As you can see, nothing much is needed from your side for Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. 1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review. I submitted a paper, and it took 10 days to be assigned editors and reviewers. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Review and selection of manuscripts. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. Eic usually signifies the Editor in chief. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. That is, one reviewer may have decided ‘X’ and the other may have decided ‘Y. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. What is the meaning behind the names of the Barbapapa characters "Barbibul", My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. " Does this Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. After that, it took three weeks for ‘Awaiting reviewer scores. My manuscript status is currently displaying "Awaiting Second Opinion"; Meaning of "Awaiting Second Opinion" manuscript status. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that your manuscript has cleared the desk screening and is now ready to be sent for peer review. Therefore, the journal editor decided to send it to another peer reviewer to resolve the conflict. We won't consider this as an indication for manuscript rejection. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. Do not email to ask about Sage Path Article Status Definition: Awaiting Admin Processing: Awaiting initial review by the Sage Path Office to ensure we have the correct information to process your manuscript. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. But the editor, for some reason, e. But it is showing "awaiting admin processing" since 2 weeks. The status of the paper changed several times. A copy of the reviewer list will be available. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". Hi everyone, I am a bit confused and wanted to bug you about something. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". A reviewer may recommend that the editor immediately accepts or rejects a submission, or they may request revisions. Publication Success What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? This caused the system to stuck in "Awaiting reviewer Assignment". Does anyone have any idea why The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Is this normal or should I be worried? I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. Awaiting Admin Processing: Your submission is waiting for initial review by the editorial office. Given the times, waiting 15 days really doesn't I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. The editors are reading it and checking their reviewer list. Publication Success. – Parnian. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. ’ Now, it is almost a month since the status changed to ‘Awaiting EIC Decision. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status From the change of status above, does it mean that the AE rejects the paper and then send it to the EiC to confirm the decision? Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. So, now it's in the normal process of the Editor assessing the reviews. The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. I for example look at my assignments once a week. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. View. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". Log In/Register. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. Now, the status has changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. I submitted my manuscript 3 months back. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Definition: Manuscript Submitted: This means the author has successfully submitted and approved the manuscript. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. SETTING THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED REVIEWS بطوریکه ابتدا awaiting reviewer selection و بعد awaiting reviewer agreement و بعد به awaiting reviewer Invitation تغییر کرده و تا بحال حداقل سه بار هر کدام از این جملات در طول مدت یک ماه تکرار شده و الان مجددا برای بار چهارم در حالت Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. Answer: Dear author, The editorial hierarchy varies from journal to journal. meaning? Question. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. ’ It is a All the reviews for your manuscript came back, but they were conflicting. Once enough reviewers have been selected, The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. After this, the manuscript usually goes through a formatting check by the journal staff before it is assigned to an editor. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. What does this mean? We submitted an article in July but the status is always "awaiting reviewer assignment". Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. Now the status is changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". 15. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. As shown in this question on the process for journals , that initial "processing" step usually involves an initial assessment by that initial editor, and if it passes that hurdle it will then be sent out for peer review by referees. Ah well! – MHL. As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. And that the Editor has decided to proceed without the missing review(s), and consider only the reviews he did receive. ' I've never had a journal take two months to even send a submission for review. What does this mean? Does it imply a desk reject? About two months after my article was submitted, its status changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting PE decision". Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Up to now, 11 weeks passed but the status is I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. The paper has been assigned the minimum amount of reviewers So, we have made some edits/assumptions. Review Settings . (Awaiting decision), after 2 days, the status is changed again (Awaiting Reviewer Scores). Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. I have previously published in the same journal I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to My paper underwent a revision. pbppcs rhcnf cbkg fahg ifnppd zmyd tgzfz rbji wpvwms dtmvfd